Pastor's Blog

Pastor's Blog

Sunday, May 10, 2020


SUNDAY, MAY 10, 2020
Read 1 Kings 3:16-28 and Psalm 57 (attached at the end)
Here are Preaching Notes for the day.  We will live-stream at 10:30 a.m. this Sunday via Facebook, you can meet in your car in the Church parking lot, and then it will be available after that online - look for the link on Church website. 

"The DNA/Compassion Test"

Introduction: What if Mom stopped doing all that Mom does?
Laundry Crisis (Copyright 2000 W. Bruce Cameron)
            As usual, I’m the one who was blamed for the recent family crisis, even though, as readers of this column well know, I am a sensitive and humble husband who is right pretty much 100 percent of the time.
            I do admit that when it comes to the system that runs the laundry at the Cameron house, I have been a tad...oblivious. By “system” I mean, of course, my wife, who takes care of washing clothes for the rest of us without complaint—until recently, as you will soon see.
            My oldest daughter has never mastered the tricky mechanism required to open and shut her dresser drawers, with the result that her clean laundry winds up right where my wife has stacked it—on the bed, where it tips onto the floor and mingles with the dirty clothes residing there. “I have nothing to wear!” she’ll shriek every once in awhile, despite the fact that she is standing ankle deep in her entire wardrobe. When I get tired of this ransacked condition and advise her she can’t go to a friend’s party until her room is cleaned up, ignoring her claim that “these are the most important people in my life I PROMISED I’d be there,” she’ll take care of the problem by gathering up everything and trucking it down to the laundry room, even if my wife just washed it that very day.
            For my youngest daughter, the issue is the competency of the laundress. “I told you that this blouse has to be washed separately,” she’ll scold. “You’re supposed to soak it in rain water and then dry it with cotton balls!” Apparently everything she owns was hand-sewn by movie stars out of butterfly silk, and my wife is constantly “ruining” things by not treating them with gentle cycles and soft murmurs.
            My son never gripes about clothes—as far as he is concerned, the laundry area could be converted into a video game room. He generally wears the same outfit until it becomes toxic; the EPA has been to our house twice to see if his clothing should be awarded Superfund status. Often, peering at the condition of his attire, I realize he has more dirt on him than I have in my yard. Cleaning his apparel causes the washing machine to make a grinding, gritty noise, as if sand has gotten into the bearings.
            Against all this, my complaint seems a pretty mild irritant: I’ve begun noticing that whatever wash cycle she is employing, my wife is causing my pants to shrink around the waist. “You’re shrinking them so bad, I can barely button them,” I grumble. “Look at this!” She regards me wearily. “Those are new pants. I haven’t even washed them yet,” she advises. “What’s your point?” I demand. Sometimes she can’t seem to stay focused. “Meaning, I couldn’t have done anything to shrink them. They came like that.” “Defective trousers?” I sputter. How much more am I supposed to endure? She pokes me lightly in the stomach. “No, they’re the right size,” she claims. “So you did shrink them!” I accuse.
            Now, even though all I am doing is serving in my prosecutorial capacity as the man of the family, she completely over-reacts. “You know what? You’re right. I must not know what I am doing. So from now on, everyone in the family has to wash their own clothes. I am through doing laundry!”
            At first I believe this is a bluff. Each of us have our family responsibilities, after all—for her not to take care of the clothes would be like me no longer bothering to decide what we will watch on television. But when, after a few days, it becomes apparent that she has no intention of calling off her unauthorized labor action, I summon the children for an emergency session of arguing over who should take over laundry duties. We decide on a system based on blame and denial. This leads to a minor disaster in which everyone’s clothing somehow becomes pink, and a demand from my children, “How are you going to get Mom back in the laundry business?” I don’t know, but I suspect it will involve a lot of chocolate.

            Were we to make a job description and list all the things that Mother's do - it would be quite a list...so many things! But as we will be reminded of today - a true mother is way more than that "list."  And, a true mother is way more than even giving birth to children. The assignment of the name of Mother in the Bible entails so much more.
            We are going to back up our story in 1 Kings 3 to the beginning of the chapter (3) because, in like manner to a good definition of what it means to be a Mother, being a King takes far more than having a crown.  Instead, God grants us what it takes to be that which God has called us to.

Earlier in 1 Kings, Chapter 3
5At Gibeon the Lord appeared to Solomon during the night in a dream, and God said, "Ask for whatever you want me to give you."
6Solomon answered, "You have shown great kindness to your servant, my father David, because he was faithful to you and righteous and upright in heart. You have continued this great kindness to him and have given him a son to sit on his throne this very day.
7"Now, O Lord my God, you have made your servant king in place of my father David. But I am only a little child and do not know how to carry out my duties.
8Your servant is here among the people you have chosen, a great people, too numerous to count or number.
9So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and wrong. For who is able to govern this great people of yours?"
10The Lord was pleased that Solomon had asked for this.

            We know this story of how Solomon became and was widely known to be the wisest person who has ever lived.  The king made his wise request in the context of a dream. He had been offering a thousand sacrifices at Gibeon, and as he worshiped, "the Lord appeared to Solomon in a dream by night, and God said, 'Ask what I shall give you'" for he had been walking in the way of his father David - in the ways of God.  God did not place any conditions on the king's request, but simply invited him to ask whatever he wished. This extraordinary and unprecedented invitation and the way that Solomon responded would reveal the character of the King (more than his job description).   
            Later, Solomon would become famous for saying, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge" (Proverbs 1:7). His own request is a perfect example, because the king begins his prayer for wisdom by reverently proclaiming who God is and what God had done. Young Solomon was a man that feared the Lord.  He acknowledges that the God of his father has put him on Israel's throne. He remembers that God has chosen his people, and when he says that they are "too many to be numbered or counted for multitude" (1 Kings 3:8), Solomon echoes the covenant promise God made to Abraham—that his children would be as countless as the stars in the sky, or the sand in the desert (Genesis 22:16-18).
            It is with humility - a fear of the Lord, that Solomon makes his request in verse 9 - he first, properly, acknowledges the greatness of God. There are those things that are far more valuable than gold.  And that is certainly Solomon's attitude in Proverbs.  Wisdom is far more valuable. 
            And God said to him, "Because you have asked this, and have not asked for yourself long life or riches or the life of your enemies, but have asked for yourself understanding to discern what is right, behold, I now do according to your word. Behold, I give you a wise and discerning mind, so that none like you has been before you and none like you shall arise after you" (1 Kings 3:10-12;  2 Chron. 1:11-12).
            It wasn't the position that made Solomon wise or to be greatly revered.  God granted him what was needed.  It did not begin with a crown or a throne... but character and Godly wisdom. 
            God was so pleased with what Solomon asked that he granted his request. The king became what God promised: the wisest man who ever lived. This gift went beyond Solomon's natural intellectual ability (which was probably exceptional), to endow him with the kind of spiritual insight that can only come from God (Proverbs 2:6).
            At this time Solomon serves as an ideal example of an important principle that Jesus taught his disciples: "Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you" (Matthew 6:33). Love for God is its own reward, but along with it come blessings. 

            Now we are at the reading for today... Solomon, swords, babies women fighting, plot twists... it's the Bold and the Beautiful or The Young and the Restless - Israelite version.
The wise decision: 1 Kings 3:16-28
            This is one of the stories that you never forget. Hearing it as a child, you remember it with vivid detail even if any full understanding of how it fits into God's plan and the lessons that are involved comes much later on. It starts first as an example of how smart and wise Solomon is. And it serves that purpose in 1 Kings very well. This is "case in point," Solomon is wise.
            -summary of the story-
            We are astounded at the idea of slaughtering a child -- inconceivable. We remember it because the wisdom is inconceivable -- it never occurs to us to answer the argument in that manner (evidence of Godly wisdom, not human). We remember it because love and justice wins out in the end.
            What a familiar situation the story presents, that age-old conflict of one person's word up against another's. It's been going on since beginning of time shows up in the nightly news...nightly. We run headlong into it under in number of contexts. Our children come running to us each with opposing stories. How do you know which one is true. Arguments, battles, and lawsuits... How do you know which one is true? It is one person's word against another's.

            We don't know the names of the women involved in fact their true identities are revealed in a much different way. The first title given to these ladies in the passage are simply a reference that they are members of the oldest profession. They are prostitutes. But not like a Hollywood version of Pretty Woman where Richard Gere comes to the rescue, and her hard-luck story has a fairytale ending. She is a working woman. Her real identity in the best title comes in the very last sentence. It identifies the woman as a member of the second oldest profession. She is a mother.
27Then the king gave his ruling: "Give
the living baby to the first woman. Do
not kill him; she is his mother."
We must be careful to note that Scripture is discriminating in bestowing that title, of mother. There are, after all, two women in the story. Both of them claim to have given birth, and both make the claim of mother. But in the story, the actual rank of mother is withheld from each of them, until that telling moment when one of the women felt compassion for the child, about to be sliced in half. 
            The text bestows on her the honor of and the mantle of motherhood. It established the quality of compassion as the difference between a biological and a Biblical mother - if we can make that distinction.  It is not her ability to separate dark and light colored clothing for the wash.
            "Compassion" is not a casual word, just as "Mother" is not used casually. It is not simply an emotional response. As a matter of fact, the Hebrew word which crosses over into English from the Hebrew for "compassion" has its root the in the word used for "womb."  Compassion in Hebrew has a very literal image of being gut-wrenching - compelled to act on behalf of another... Pregnancy (not to presume knowledge beyond me) is also gut-wrenching... there must be a better way of saying that!

Compassion and Womb - literally and figuratively stirrings deep inside...
            An author and theologian by the name of Phyllis Tribble suggests that despite our diligence in digesting the details of this story, the real gold to be mined is a yet deeper understanding of God - as seen in this mother. Remember that the Bible is not about us, it may be full of stories and characters, patriarchs and matriarchs, sin and devotion... But it's all to reveal God and God's nature.
            Tribble builds on her insight about womb imagery in the Hebrew Bible, noting that in the singular, the word means 'womb' or 'uterus', but in the plural the word includes the abstract terms of compassion, mercy, and love. Theologically conceived, God creates and nurtures the fetus in the womb, prepares the uterus for birth, assists in the delivery, receives the infant from the womb, and sustains the newborn's life into the future. Divine compassion is expressed by the metaphor of a mother's experience and stirrings of feelings and carrying a child to term in her womb and in bonding to that life throughout the offspring's and her future existence.
26The woman whose son was alive was
filled with compassion for her son and
said to the king, "Please, my lord, give
her the living baby! Don't kill him!" But
the other said, "Neither I nor you shall
have him. Cut him in two!"
            The compassionate woman's maternal feelings were stirred, verse 26, literally of her wombs were stirred, out of compassion for her son. Her opponent, on the other hand, is inhumanly cold. Even when she has one the baby by the compassionate woman's capitulation, she still insists on the 50-50 split which would be objectively fair, but morally monstrous. Biological mother, allows for objectively fair, but room to be morally monstrous. The Biblical mother, gives up her rights for the sake of the other. She makes a sacrifice, it's not about her.
            In other words, in this story, there is a difference between a mere biological mother and Godly/compassionate/Biblical Mother. A merely biological mother believes the womb to be an agent of control over life, the life it contains. This kind of mother - she has exclusive ownership of the life that is to be birthed. It is after all a part of her - all decisions are made with regard to herself. Her life is greater than the life within her. Her womb, her rules. I am not denying women's rights - this is an extreme story with extreme contrasts to making something extremely clear. 
            A Biblical mother sees the womb as the agent for giving life and freedom. It is a safe place in which life is nurtured, and it's also the instrument that yields and engenders something/one that she puts ahead of herself.  And whenever that concept of bringing forth life is threatened or diminished, a Biblical mother's womb cries out with yearning to reestablish it. Compassion - a gut stirring move to act on behalf of another.
            John Piper writes...
           The way of love is both the way of self-denial and the way of ultimate joy. We deny ourselves the fleeting pleasures of sin and luxury and self-absorption in order to seek the kingdom above all things. In doing so we bring the greatest good to others, we magnify the worth of Christ as a treasure chest of joy, and we find our greatest satisfaction. God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him. And the supremacy of that glory shines most brightly when the satisfaction that we have in him endures in spite of suffering and pain in the mission of love.
            So, then, how does the Biblical Mother give us a glimpse of God? Frankly, this should be obvious. It is God in whom we live and move and have our being, as if we live and move in a mother's womb. It is God from whom we must be born again. It is God who lets us go, granting us free will. Giving us birth. It is God who allows us to make our own choices. It is God who suffers right along with us when we make wrong choices. It is still God, at least according to the writer of Deuteronomy, who like a mother eagle pushes her offspring out of the nest, teaches us to fly, and wills is to fulfill the purposes for which each of us was born.
            From Jeremiah 1:5, we hear...
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.

We also read Psalm 57 because it too has an obvious feminine image for God...
1 Kings 3 has quite a fight/dispute... note that in Psalm 57 the nature of God is also revealed in adversity.
            In the Psalm David appears to be in deep trouble. He talks of people setting traps for him and of being surrounded by enemies. As important as those facts are to him, we, in reality, learn very little about the actual trouble that he is in and much more about the God to whom he looks.
            Scripture speaks to the idea that God's character is revealed in adversity in many ways on many occasions. God is revealed God's true nature is revealed when the Hebrews are under the watchful eyes and heavy hands of the oppression of Egyptian taskmasters. God delivers them. Job learned of God's nature on an ash heap. Jonah learned of God in the deep of the sea. All humanity learned of God upon the cross, for while he we were yet sinners Christ died for us to reveal God is the God of love and redemption. In adversity God's colors shine.
What is the nature that is revealed? In Psalm 57,
1Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy
on me, for in you my soul takes refuge. I
will take refuge in the shadow of your
wings until the disaster has passed.
2I cry out to God Most High, to God, who
fulfills [his purpose] for me.

            God's nature is expressed in feminine images that are as accurate as masculine ones. Here's one passage in which God is compared to a mother bird gathers her brood under her wing. God's nature is discussed in the Bible in feminine metaphors with equal accuracy as when discussed under masculine ones. God is one who protects us. David believes the soul can take refuge in the shadow of God's wings. He believes, too, that this protection will last until the storm has passed.  As it happens, the Hebrew word for "wings" can also be translated as "skirts."  Mother hen/wings - not unlike hiding behind a Mother's skirt...
            Jesus uses that very same image... it's a good one to reveal the  character of God...
"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!" (Matthew 23:37)

Such obvious parallels between the Biblical Mother/feminine imagery and God:
            If those parallels are not obvious to us, they would be in the Hebrew language of Scripture. Whenever we read the passage that told of Moses encountering God on Sinai, Exodus 34
So Moses chiseled out two stone tablets like the first ones and went up Mount Sinai early in the morning, as the Lord had commanded him; and he carried the two stone tablets in his hands. Then the Lord came down in the cloud and stood there with him and proclaimed his name, the Lord. And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The Lord, the Lord, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulnessmaintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin.

In those Hebrew words define the word 'compassion' at its source.
"Wherever the mercy of God is described, we would also find the family words derived from the root "womb." We would see with our own eyes that what is being said is this: it is as if God has a womb which weeps for us, yearns for us, and trembles with hope that we will be all we were born to be." (Cindy Johnson)

Conclusion: Anthropological Evidence of Compassion
            One day a student asked anthropologist Margaret Mead for the earliest sign of civilization in a given culture. He expected the answer to be a clay pot or perhaps a fish hook or grinding stone. Her answer was "a healed femur." Mead explained that no healed femurs are found where the law of the jungle, survival of the fittest, reigns. A healed femur shows that someone cared. Someone had to do that injured person's hunting and gathering until the leg healed. The evidence of compassion is the first sign of civilization.
            And, it is evidence of God's true character as revealed in our Mothers.


1 Kings 3:16-28
16Now two prostitutes came to the king
and stood before him.
17One of them said, "My lord, this
woman and I live in the same house. I
had a baby while she was there with me.
18The third day after my child was born,
this woman also had a baby. We were
alone; there was no one in the house
but the two of us.
19"During the night this woman's son
died because she lay on him.
20So she got up in the middle of the
night and took my son from my side
while I your servant was asleep. She put
him by her breast and put her dead son
by my breast.
21The next morning, I got up to nurse my
son-and he was dead! But when I
looked at him closely in the morning
light, I saw that it wasn't the son I had borne."
22The other woman said, "No! The living
one is my son; the dead one is yours."
But the first one insisted, "No! The dead
one is yours; the living one is mine." And
so they argued before the king.
23The king said, "This one says, 'My son
is alive and your son is dead,' while that
one says, 'No! Your son is dead and
mine is alive.' "
24Then the king said, "Bring me a
sword." So they brought a sword for the king.
25He then gave an order: "Cut the living
child in two and give half to one and half
to the other."
26The woman whose son was alive was
filled with compassion for her son and
said to the king, "Please, my lord, give
her the living baby! Don't kill him!" But
the other said, "Neither I nor you shall
have him. Cut him in two!"
27Then the king gave his ruling: "Give
the living baby to the first woman. Do
not kill him; she is his mother."
28When all Israel heard the verdict the
king had given, they held the king in
awe, because they saw that he had
wisdom from God to administer justice.





PSALM 57
1Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy
on me, for in you my soul takes refuge. I
will take refuge in the shadow of your
wings until the disaster has passed.
2I cry out to God Most High, to God, who
fulfills [his purpose] for me.
3He sends from heaven and saves me,
rebuking those who hotly pursue me;
Selah God sends his love and his faithfulness.
4I am in the midst of lions; I lie among
ravenous beasts- men whose teeth are
spears and arrows, whose tongues are sharp swords.
5Be exalted, O God, above the heavens;
let your glory be over all the earth.
6They spread a net for my feet- I was
bowed down in distress. They dug a pit
in my path- but they have fallen into it
themselves. Selah
7My heart is steadfast, O God, my heart
is steadfast; I will sing and make music.
8Awake, my soul! Awake, harp and lyre!
I will awaken the dawn.
9I will praise you, O Lord, among the
nations; I will sing of you among the peoples.
10For great is your love, reaching to the
heavens; your faithfulness reaches to the skies.
11Be exalted, O God, above the
heavens; let your glory be over all the earth.


Sunday, May 3, 2020

SUNDAY, MAY 3, 2020 Read Acts 2:42-47


SUNDAY, MAY 3, 2020
Read Acts 2:42-47 
Here are Preaching Notes for the day.  We will live-stream at 10:30 a.m. this Sunday via Facebook, you can meet in your car in the Church parking lot, and then it will be available after that online - look for the link on Church website.  Communion will also be available, in your car (the elements sealed in bags), as you leave through the designated parking lot exit.

"Unwritten Rules"
Introduction
            Every sport has rules. Most of these rules are codified in a complex document that has been revised and ratified at various times by the teams, owners, clubs, etc. You follow these official rules, and if you don’t, you pay a penalty.
            Many sports, especially professional baseball and golf, have unwritten rules. If you break them, you will not be assessed a foul or penalty because what you did technically conformed to the official rule book. If you are a professional player, however, you know these rules, so breaking them is serious. Baseball's 'unwritten' rules include:
·         Do not bunt to break up a no-hitter.
·         Do not spend your time admiring a home run you hit.
·         Do not steal bases if your team is ahead by a significant amount.
·         Do not try to steal signs while standing in the batter’s box.
·         Do not speak to a pitcher who is in the process of throwing a no-hitter.
·         A pitcher is not to indicate displeasure if one of his fielders commits an error.

            If a player violates an unwritten rule, he probably knows that the next time he steps into the batter’s box, the pitcher on the opposing team will throw a “purpose pitch” (otherwise known as a “brushback pitch” or a bean ball). Thou shalt not break the unwritten rules of baseball! These rules, evolved over time, are meant to establish boundaries for behavior which, if observed, contribute to good sportsmanship. In baseball, the players know that there’s no showboating, no headhunting and no sign stealing.
            Do you suppose there are unwritten rules in the church?  Absolutely. The most important unwritten rule of church is: “Thou shalt not covet nor sit in thy neighbor’s pew,” or should I say, "Parking Spot"? Some other unwritten rules of church life might include: Thou shalt tolerate the Preacher's jokes. And, every potluck shall include... you know what I might say, and it would never be a criticism, but you were already filling in the blanks of the things we have seen at every potluck since dawn of casseroles.
            Sometimes, the unwritten rules of the church are unknown to us. They are rules in place without us being aware of them. Josh Daffern, blogger and pastor (“6 Unwritten Rules of Today’s Church.” Patheos, 8/19/19), suggests that many churches have six unwritten rules. People attending this church shall:
1.      look like us
2.      dress like us
3.      talk like us
4.      vote like us
5.      sin like us (honestly - this way we don't have to say it aloud)
6.      believe like us
If you can’t follow these rules, you might need to find another church.

            OUCH. Surely we are better than that.  Though we might say that every institution has unwritten rules - our Church should not resemble a club or display such bigotry. Today’s text speaks of a different set of unwritten rules that govern our shared life together as the church. And, they were devoted to them... (verse 42 "They devoted themselves to...")
Devoted
            This is what we are talking about today - these things that they were devoted to and did not need to be told to do... the unwritten rules of being a Church that they just obeyed.  They exist...
            The kind of prickly Danish theologian, Soren Kierkegaard, understood this when he wrote: “The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand, "we are obliged to act accordingly."
            In Revelation, the church at Laodicia was criticized for its failure to be “devoted” to the degree that the first Christians were devoted. “I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm — neither hot nor cold — I am about to spit you out of my mouth” (Revelation 3:15-16). Strong words, but the readers at the time knew exactly what was being said here.
            Near Laodicia in what is today Pamukkale (ancient Hierapolis) was (and still is) a hot springs where once Cleopatra and Roman troops quartered and refreshed themselves. The water flowed out of this spring at a very hot temperature, but by the time the water reached Laodicia, it was only lukewarm.
            We’ve got to be hot! We need to be devoted.

They Devoted Themselves to the Apostles' TEACHING
            It is an unwritten rule that we as students of the Master -- follow. "They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching” (verse 42).  The course outline offered by the early apostolic professors featured the life and teachings of Christ, and the interpretation of the Hebrew scriptures in light of the Messiah who had so recently appeared.
            Serious followers of Jesus want to know all they can know. They’re eager to drink at the fountain of knowledge. They are interested in what the Word has to say. So the study of God’s word is just a given. It’s what we do as followers.
            Granted, studying the Word of God sort of is a rule. We are told to study; we are expected to study. So, perhaps, it is not an unwritten rule so much as a written rule. But, what is interesting is that the early Church did not need to be told. They wanted to study. They had a need for the word of God like a baby needs its mother’s milk.
·         “As newborn infants, long for the pure, spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow unto salvation, now that you have tasted that the Lord is good.” (1 Peter 2:2-3).
No need to explain to them or try to convince them; they wanted the nourishment of the Word of God.  They were hungry.  It is so easy to be devoted when you are hungry - in fact, when I am hungry it is a huge distraction - it begins to consume and preoccupies my thoughts. What if my desire/hunger for God's Word did the same?!  
            Still, lest the importance of study elude us, the Bible is clear: We need to be in the Word of God.
·         “How can young people keep their way pure? By guarding it according to your Word” (Psalm 119:9).
·         “I treasure your word in my heart so that I may not sin against you” (Psalm 119:11).
·         “This book of the law shall not depart out of your mouth; you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to act in accordance with all that is written in it. For then you shall make your way prosperous, and then you shall be successful” (Joshua 1:8).

            Follow the Master, and his teachers - the Apostles... It's what we do! And being devoted is how we learn.... and there is a lot to learn.
Illustration  (How Different Cultures Read the Bible)
            To help explain the challenges people in the West face reading the Bible, authors E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O'Brien refer to a social experiment in "The Forgotten Famine" by Mark Allan Powell. Powell had twelve students in a seminary class read the story of the prodigal son from Luke's Gospel, then close their Bibles and retell the story as faithfully as possible to a partner. None of the twelve American seminary students mentioned the famine in Luke 15:14, which precipitates the son's eventual return. Powell then had one hundred people participate in the same experiment and the results revealed that only six of the one hundred mentioned the famine. The "famine-forgetters," as Powell called them, had only one thing in common: they were from the United States.
            Later Powell tried the experiment in St. Petersburg, Russia. He gathered fifty participants to read and retell the prodigal son story. This time an overwhelming forty-two of the fifty participants mentioned the famine. Why? Just seventy years before, 670,000 people died of starvation after a siege of the capital city began a three-year famine (World War 1). Famine was very much a part of the history and imagination of the Russian participants. (E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O'Brien, Misreading Scripture With Western Eyes, IVP, 2012)
            The Russian participants saw the world through a lens that included famine.  We Westerners - not so much.  Studying (the teachings of the Apostles - the Bible) teaches our children, and us a Biblical world view - so that they/we see the world through the eyes of Christ. So that we love our neighbors as ourselves. And can even answer the question posed in Scripture, "Who is my neighbor?" Reading Scripture gives us a lens by which to view all time, history, places, events, all people, nations, and viruses...

Transition: Listen to Ephesians 2:19-22
19 Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people and also members of his household, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. 21 In him the whole building is joined together and rises to become a holy temple in the Lord. 22 And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.
We are both "built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone" (our devotion listed), and "being built together" (our next devotion from our  passage today).  This was true of the early Church of Acts, the later Church of Ephesus, and still true of our "as of late" Church.
They Devoted Themselves to FELLOWSHIP
42"They devoted themselves to the
apostles' teaching and to the fellowship..."
            It doesn’t say that they devoted themselves to “the fellowship;” rather, they devoted themselves "to fellowship.”  In this instance it is not a reference to being devoted to a group or a cause - but they were devoted to an ACTION. The word we translate “fellowship” is the Greek word koinonia.
            When we hear “fellowship,” what do we think of? Cookies and coffee before Church... on a normal Sunday? Hey, nothing wrong with cookies and coffee, but koinonia, Biblical fellowship, runs a lot deeper than that.  This is the first time this word appears in the Bible.  The root Greek word of koinonia is the word koinonos, which means: a sharer, a companion, one who is a partaker, a partner with others. They were devoted to building, fostering, growing increasing their fellowship - and because of that they took action!
            Koinonia refers to having things in common, sharing in the common things. It starts with what we all have in common as Christians. We all believe in one true God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  In Ephesians 4:1-6, Paul talks about what we have as the Body of Christ.
 "As a prisoner for the Lord, then, I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received. Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all."
The active, action filled, sharing in the common things is what makes us a koinonia, a fellowship.

Illustration (the nature of true fellowship)
In (the movie) The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood), a hobbit, is given the unenviable task of destroying a ring in The Cracks of Doom in a dark and evil land called Mordor. His task is fraught with mortal danger.
Gandalf, the wizard, understands such a perilous journey could cause anyone to become discouraged. Gandalf encourages Frodo's best friend, Samwise Gamgee (Sean Astin), to accompany Frodo on the trip. In fact, Gandalf makes Samwise promise he will never leave Frodo. Several other brave individuals accompany Frodo as well. These nine travelers become the "Fellowship of the Ring."
Well into the journey, the lives of those in the Fellowship have been endangered on multiple occasions. Concerned for the safety of his friends, Frodo makes a private and noble decision to slip away from his friends and make the remainder of the journey on his own. Frodo steps into a boat and quietly pushes away from the shore.
Suddenly, the branches on the sloping hill above the shore begin to snap and give way to a tiny hobbit warrior. Samwise Gamgee crashes through the branches and onto the shore shouting, "Frodo! Mr. Frodo!"
Frodo yells back, "Go back, Sam! I'm going to Mordor alone!"
Sam is not deterred. He continues toward Frodo, splashing into the river up to his waist. "Of course you are, and I'm coming with you!"
"You can't swim!" Frodo shouts. "Sam! Sam!"
Sam tries desperately to swim out to the boat. Frodo watches as Sam begins to sink beneath the murky surface of the river.
Frodo reaches down and grabs Sam's wrist, pulling him up and into the boat. Frodo looks at Sam as if to say, "Why? Why would you risk your life attempting to swim out to me?"
A soaking wet Sam sees the question in Frodo's eyes and says, "I made a promise, Mr. Frodo. A promise. 'Don't you leave him, Samwise Gamgee.' And I don't mean to. I don't mean to."
Frodo embraces Sam. "Come on," he smiles.

            That common life and fellowship shows itself in how we care for one another. Love–love for our brothers and sisters in the family, expressed in helpful, practical ways. When some of us are hurting, we’re all hurting. When some of us rejoice, we all rejoice. When we see a brother or sister in the family in need, we act to meet that need.  That sharing in Spiritual things together extended to the joyful and literal sharing of material things together as well.
They Devoted Themselves to SHARING
44All the believers were together and
had everything in common.
45Selling their possessions and goods,
they gave to anyone as he had need.
46Every day they continued to meet
together in the temple courts. They
broke bread in their homes and ate
together with glad and sincere hearts,
47praising God and enjoying the favor of
all the people.

            Today’s reading is part of the account of the reaction of a group of “devout Jews” (Acts 2:5) to one of the first Christian sermons. The sermon (Acts 2:14-36) was delivered by Peter on the occasion of Pentecost, the coming of the Holy Spirit upon a group of Jesus’ followers and bystanders (Acts 2:1-13). Today’s passage describes, in part, the aftermath of that momentous event. Today’s lesson is a description — the first of several in Acts — of one of the earliest Christian communities.  These are changed lives living in changed way.
            The reaction to this apparently incontrovertible proof of Jesus’ identity as “both Lord and Messiah” (Acts 2:36) is that those who heard it were “cut to the heart” (acts 2:37) and sought guidance from the apostles, and the best practices. Peter responds that the bystanders need to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins, and then they will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38).
Text Box:  Not everybody in Jerusalem sold and gave away everything. We read in verse 46 that they met in one another's homes. But I thought they'd all sold their homes and their furniture and their possessions! Apparently not. The giving and selling were voluntary—as it should be today. I think I hear sighs of relief in the church. You were afraid I was going to tell you to go and sell everything. No, that's not the vocation of every Christian. Nevertheless, we should not avoid the challenge of these verses. Those early Christians loved one another—hardly surprising, since the fruit of the Spirit is love. They cared for their poor sisters and brothers who were less fortunate than themselves. They shared their goods. They shared their homes.
            Something truly amazing happens and the Church is born.  Coming into fellowship with God brings us into fellowship with each other. Being devoted to God births  devotion to each other... this is the Lord's will, and is what is so winsome about the Body of Christ, the Church. This kind of fellowship and sharing.

Illustration (Craig Barnes, “The post-anxiety church,” The Christian Century, January 29, 2016)
            When I speak at denominational gatherings, pastors often ask me to say something about the future of the church. The subtext of their invitations is, “If you have any ideas for survival, let us know.” The future of the church is a question that makes it way deep into my bones. I worry, too. But the church has never looked less attractive than when it dresses in anxiety. Historically, that’s when we’ve made our worst mistakes...
            Little good comes from getting fixated on the empty pews. The ... church has to stop fretting about its future. The anxiety takes up the air and leaves the church too lethargic to offer anything to the world. The alternative response is for the church to do what it’s always done at its best, what it did from the beginning: stop thinking about its future and sacrifice itself to its mission.
            When I was working my way through a graduate program in the history of Christianity, I became convinced that there is no rational explanation for the church’s survival over the past 2,000 years — there were many compelling political, intellectual and social reasons for it to have gone out of business long ago. And none of those threats were ever as dangerous to the church as it was to itself. We’ve always been our own worst enemy when we fail to live out of the gospel we proclaim. But still the church perseveres.
            The only possible explanation for the church’s survival is that Jesus Christ chose to use it to continue his mission of bringing the kingdom of God to earth.
            This is the picture we get in Acts 2.  They lacked for nothing when they were continuing Christ's mission.

            So... Unwritten rules. This is an important discussion because we all know what happens when unwritten rules are broken. It’s not pretty. Benches clear. Dugouts empty. Fists and punches are thrown. Bats fly. Players can actually get ejected from the game! All because some unwritten rule — like brushing back the pitcher who’s up to bat — is broken.
            Instead of stating it in the negative - breaking unwritten rules - let's state it positively: Living by the rules - more specifically, living as Christ would have us live - bears so much fruit! 
...They broke bread in their homes and ate
together with glad and sincere hearts,
47praising God and enjoying the favor of
all the people. And the Lord added to
their number daily those who were being saved.
Oh how God can work through such a Church!

Finally, take note
They Devoted Themselves to the BREAKING OF BREAD
42They devoted themselves to the
apostles' teaching and to the fellowship,
to the breaking of bread and to prayer.
            A few years/centuries later, the church squabbled over many things regarding the Breaking of Bread - which is most assuredly a reference to the Lord's Supper.  Let's say that something got lost over time and they were devoted to something else... and that somethign else, anything else, makes us that much more not the Church God calls us to be.  Someone has said that the four most disputed words in the entire history of the church are "This is my Body." Historically that little clip of four words has engendered massive arguments. How is it the Body of Christ? and how literally is it the Body of Christ? and how exactly is God present? Transubstantiation?  Consubstantiation? Catholic? Protestant? Or protestant?

Right up front - the Lord's Supper rightfully serves as a center and symbol of Christian unity.

            1 Corinthians 11 - which we use so often use for our Words of Institution ("On  the night in which the Lord Jesus was betrayed..." the words spoken during all communion services) and hold dear as our understanding of what Communion means... Paul has to say out loud and make explicit an unwritten rule. And he is disgusted that he needs to do this...
            Verse 20 (of 1 Corinthians 11), "When you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you eat." No sirree. You're enjoying your caviar. "As you eat, each one of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry and another gets drunk." Now you come to the part of the service where you actually have the Lord's Supper. Where is the unity in all of this? "Don't you have homes to eat and drink in?" The Lord's Supper isn't primarily about satisfying your physical needs. "You despise the church of God and humiliate those people who have nothing." Paul is blistering. "What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you for this? Certainly not."
            He comes to this again in verse 33, "So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for each other. If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you meet together it may not result in judgment." In other words, he gets rid of all this " table fellowship " if all it's going to do is generate more animosity and resentment and bitterness and feelings of superiority and inferiority and inclusion and exclusion. This rite that is supposed to be a center point of Christian unity has become the focal point for division. (D. A. Carson)
            They were breaking some unwritten rules that undermined the whole affair. Their mind and devotion was on food, or themselves, at the expense of fellowship with God and each other. The Lord's Supper, the Breaking of the Bread in this case - is all about Sacramental fellowship - regardless of how any denomination wants to view it.  Just like baptism is not about how much water is used, so Communion is way more real than even the taste and smell and elements, bread and wine. Hear 1 Corinthians 10:16 (which contains our new word, Koinonia)...
16 Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation/koinonia in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation/koinonia in the body of Christ?

What is meant in the context is that the cup of thanksgiving, the rite itself constitutes a fellowship of Christ, a fellowship of the blood of Christ, a fellowship of the Body of Christ.  Koinonia with each other and with Christ.  The Lord's Supper serves as a center as well as a symbol of Christian unity.


Conclusion: Verse 43
            In one of the "eatingest" congregations... if we talk about being FULL - and you might think of full of Jessie's Shepherd Pie, or Mag's smoked Salmon, Joe's Pasole, Darla's Jean Bars, Joy's bread, Irene's cake, Hank's Split Pea Soup, Sheri's chocolate truffles, anything Mary Lynn or Beverly make... it is a long list -like I said, eatingest congregations (I love it)...  That early Church was FULL...
43Everyone was filled with awe, and
many wonders and miraculous signs
were done by the apostles.

Their needs were met.  They were full.  And I dare say that not all  their needs were food related. 

Illustration (Ronnie Floyd, Our Last Great Hope, Thomas Nelson, 2011, pp. 167-169)
            There was a man named Jeremiah Lanphier who lived in New York City during the 1850s. Those were years of tension, when the shadow of war loomed over America. There were strikes, depressions, tailing banks, long jobless lines, and an air of simmering violence. In this setting, Lanphier accepted a calling as a full-time city evangelist. He walked the streets, knocked on doors, put up posters, and prayed constantly—all to no visible result.
            As his discouragement increased, Lanphier looked for some kind of new idea, some possibility for breakthrough. New York was a business town; maybe the men would come to a luncheon. So he nailed up his signs, calling for a noon lunch in the Old Dutch Church on Fulton Street. When the hour came, he sat and waited until finally a single visitor arrived. Several minutes later, a couple of stragglers peeked through the door. The handful of them had a nice meal.
            Lanphier gave his idea another go on the following week. Twenty men attended; at least it was a start. But then forty came on the third week. The men were getting to know each other by this time, and one of them suggested he'd be willing to come for food and prayer every day. Lanphier thought that was a good sign, and he ramped up his efforts for a daily meal and prayer time.
            Before long, the building was overflowing. The luncheon had to move again and again, so high was the demand. The most intriguing element of the "Fulton Street Revival," as they called the phenomenon, was the ripple effect. Offices began closing for prayer at noon …. Fulton Street was the talk of the town, with men telegraphing prayer news back and forth between New York City and other cities—yes, other cities had started their own franchises; other godly meetings were launching in New York.
            The center of the meeting was prayer, and it was okay to come late or leave early, as needed …. Men stood and shared testimonies. [This was not] a place for the well-known preachers of the day—this was about the working class, businessmen who wanted to share the things of God.
            Some historians went so far as to refer to the Fulton Street Revival as the Third Great Awakening, because it lasted for two years and saw as many as one million decisions for Christ. Given the influence of New York City, no one could estimate the national and international impact that spread out from Jeremiah Lanphier's simple lunch break FELLOWSHIPS.

What does a Spirit-filled church look like? What evidence did that first century Church give of the presence and power of the Holy Spirit in its midst? Almost like bring two loaves of bread and a few fish to Jesus - the 5,000 had their fill.
"And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved."