Faith
in Christ and Love for the Saints
"Jesus + Nothing"
Colossians
1:15-23
Introduction: filling in the gaps...
·
Our main glimpse into the
childhood of Jesus Christ is the story we read from the Gospel of Luke, which
revealed Christ’s deep spiritual understanding and desire to “be about My
Father’s business” (Luke 2:49).
·
Luke 2:40 gives a summary
statement describing Jesus’ development from infancy to age 12: “And the Child
grew and became strong in spirit, filled with wisdom; and the grace of God was
upon Him.”
·
Matthew names four
brothers—James, Joses, Simon and Judas (Matthew 13:55). There were also at
least two sisters (verse 56). Thus, Jesus was the oldest of at least seven
children.
·
It takes just a few minutes total
to cover all the information we have available... leaving so many gaps in his life before his ministry
began.
But, such a person of interest... we
naturally want to know more! There are a
lot of other writings that attempt to fill in the gaps - they are just not the
Bible. I don't mean that in a casual way - I clearly mean to imply that
they are apocryphal (a story or statement of doubtful authenticity).
·
The childhood of Jesus is
mentioned in the following apocryphal writings: the Infancy Gospel of Thomas (from
the second century), the Pseudo-Matthew (6th-7th century), the Arabic Infancy
Gospel (probably 6th century), and the Irish Versified Narrative (perhaps as
early as 700 A.D.).
·
The gap stories filled in of
Jesus boyhood have one single purpose; he is to be shown to the world as the
one who has superhuman power and shows at an early age that he has knowledge that only the divine could have.
Jesus is a healer and restores/takes health and even life.
·
The portrait of Jesus is a
mixture of transcendent and vivid personality and, at the same time, he acts
like an ornery and vengeful little brat. The combination is typical tool to
display his humanity and his divinity.
Examples
·
A well known apocryphal story
regards an events dealing with Jesus and some 'home-made' birds. It is told
many different ways and usually follows a similar pattern. Jesus gathers water,
makes it clear, clean, and good. He then uses it with clay to make birds,
usually twelve sparrows. He does it on a Sabbath. When chastised, he makes the
sparrows chirp and fly away. He punishes his accusers.
·
Another whole series of stories
centers around Jesus cursing a boy(s). It features the following recurring
scenarios: Jesus is attacked or vilified by one or several boys; he curses the
attacker who dies or is incapacitated. A conversation with Joseph or/and Mary
leads to the restoration of the boy’s health or life. Almost like a refrain,
the stories mention the wonderment of the people, the fact that Jesus’ every
word becomes immediately fulfilled, the rejection of Jesus and his parents by
those around them, and the puzzlement of Joseph (and Mary).
Basically
- people felt that what we do have/know about Jesus is not enough. They wanted to fill in the gaps as a matter
of curiosity and speculation.
There
was a heretical movement in the time of Paul's letter to the Colossians that
purported that our knowledge of God had huge gaps and that knowing Jesus was
not enough to fill them in. Instead, we
needed to be privy to a secret knowledge.
They
asserted that Jesus fell short of being fully divine. Thus his work on the
cross, all his saving acts, were insufficient as well. They were not enough in
and of themselves to save us. The "Gnostics," as they have come to be
known, were ready to step in and show us how to bridge our knkowledge gaps and
supply us with missing information.
The prevailing heresies...
- The diverse sects that church historians commonly call “Gnosticism”
may have their roots in the syncretistic and esoteric teachings of the
followers of Simon the Magician in the late first century. Mentioned in
Acts 8:9-24 first as a practitioner of magic, and then later as lacking
real faith, he was rebuked by Peter (Acts 8:20-23). Early Christian
history tells us that Simon began claiming that he was a great god who had
come down from heaven and that his accompanying prostitute, Helena, was
his first creation.
- We can’t be sure that Simon’s teachings had made their way to
Colossae by the 60's, but it is certainly possible. Regardless, the
teaching of Simon was not the only one of its kind at the time of Paul’s
ministry. Other teachers and splinter groups had been trying to mix pagan
religion, Eastern mysticism, and a dualistic worldview with Christianity.
- These are the basic ingredients of Gnosticism: Gnostics generally taught that Christ
was only one of many spirit-beings and that he sprang forth (created/born)
from an unknown god to bring salvation by special, esoteric knowledge (gnosis) to the spiritually elite.
Many Gnostics either wrote their own false scriptures to compete with the
writings of the apostles, or they reinterpreted Scripture in a highly
allegorical or spiritual sense to support their strange, speculative
theologies.
- Regardless of its various manifestations, Gnostic teaching tended to
have a few key features. First, Gnostics shared the idea that there was a
divine spark in all humans. This spark had fallen from the heavenly realm
into this world and needed to be awakened and reintegrated into the
divine. Second, they believed that the creation of this evil, physical
world was not the work of the one true God but rather the work of an inferior,
lesser being. Third, the Gnostics taught that salvation was by
illumination or esoteric knowledge, whereby the “knower” came to recognize
the spiritual/divine component within, leading to a return to the
heavenly, spiritual realm.
There
is nothing to be learned about Jesus that is not supported by Scripture. I said
that carefully - it is not that Scripture can contain all there is to know
about God. No, Scripture is sufficient and all that we need to know about Jesus
is in there. And what we need to know about Jesus is his real identity as God.
·
The heresies facing the Colossian
church centered on the person of Christ. The heretics denied his humanity
saying that Jesus was one of many lesser descending spirit beings that emanated
from God. Not unlike angels. They taught a form of philosophic dualism, saying
that the spirit was good and matter was evil. Hence, a good emanation like
Christ could never take on a body composed of evil matter. The idea that God
himself could become man was absurd to them. Thus they denied his deity.
·
Nor did they think the Christ was
adequate for salvation. Salvation required a superior, mystical, secret
knowledge, beyond that of the Gospels. It also involved worshiping the good
emanations (like angels), and keeping the Jewish ceremonial laws. In the first
three chapters of Colossians, Paul confronts these heresies head-on.
In Colossians 1:15-20, Paul reveals
our Lord's true identity by viewing him in relation to four things: God, the
universe, the unseen world, and the church.
Jesus Christ in relation to God the Father
15He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all
creation.
·
The Greek word for "image" is eikon. Like ICON. Image or
likeness.
·
When using the term eikon, Paul emphasizes that Jesus is
both the representation and manifestation of God. He is the full, final,
and complete revelation of God.
·
Being the firstborn over all creation, doesn't mean he was the
first to be born. Instead it is more like a title or rank. He is over all of
creation just as God is over all of creation. Just like in the time of Paul,
and those early Gnostic roots, these same wrong teachings exist in our present
world... in our town - I promise you. Biblical language such as being firstborn
over all creation, when not studied in depth, is taken to prove that Jesus had
a finite beginning. He was born and a part of creation - thus less than
God. People around us use this language
and twisted interpretation to say that there is no Trinity, nor is Christ
divine.
·
Paul emphasizes that Jesus is both the representation and
manifestation of God. Fully divine,
fully human.
Jesus Christ in relation to the universe
16For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or
powers or rulers or authorities; all
things were created by him and for
him. 17He is
before all things, and in him all things
hold together.
·
Paul asserts that Jesus is the creator of the known universe, and not
some part of the universe. The Gnostics believed that Jesus was some emanation
from God, but the creator of this imperfect world had to be something even less
than Jesus. A lesser being who creates this dirty nasty physical world.
·
In my mind, Paul's words in
some way redeem this world. God only creates good things and for good
purposes. So if this world was created by God, it was not created wrongly or
imperfectly. Think about the greatness in the vastness of the physical world,
and how it does and should bring glory to God as its creator. By studying the
creation, one can gain a glimpse of the power, knowledge, and wisdom of the
Creator. The sheer size of the universe is staggering. The sun, for example,
has a diameter of 864,000 miles. That's 100 times that of Earth's diameter and
it can hold 1.3 million planets the size of Earth inside of it. The star Betelgeuse,
however, has a diameter of 100 million miles, which is larger than the Earth's
orbit around the sun. WOW!
Jesus Christ in relation to the unseen world
(16) whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities
·
We believe in the spiritual world that cannot be fully seen with
our eyes... though we might be granted a glimpse, a vision, or knowledge of
such things, such as when an Angel appears. The Gnostics did as well, but they
have this terrible dualistic view of spirit and matter and hierarchy. Angels
had a place in the spiritual world as emanations from God. To them the angels
were obviously a step closer to realizing
true spiritual knowledge and throwing off all physical elements that are
evil. Thrones, dominions, rulers, and
authorities referred to the various ranks of angels. Scripture is clear
that Jesus is not an angel, but the creator of the Angels. He is above the
Angels, in fact worship him and are under his authority. Jesus relation to the
unseen world, because relationship to the visible universe, proves he is God.
Jesus Christ in relation to the Body of
Christ
18And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.
·
There are many metaphors used in Scripture describe the church. It
is called the family, a kingdom, a vineyard, a flock, a building, and the
Bride. But the most profound metaphor, one having no Old Testament equivalent,
is that of a body. The church is a body, and Christ is the head of the body.
This concept is not used in the sense of the head of a company, a CEO, but
rather looks at the church as a living organism, inseparably tied together by
the living Christ. He controls every part of it and gives it its life and
direction. Christ is not an angel to serve the church, he is the head of the
church.
19For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him...
·
The Gnostics, believing that Jesus and angels and
other spiritual beings had emanated from God (and were far superior to us
but less than God), and that God's
attributes in godliness and power were spread out amongst those creatures. All
of God's divine powers and attributes were divided among these various
emanations. Paul counters the false teaching by stating that all the fullness
of deity is not spread out in small doses to groups of spirits, fully dwells
and is manifested in Christ alone. These ideas in Gnosticism were more developed
later but still present in early forms during Paul's life.
As Hebrews 1:3 says, "the son
is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being,
sustaining all things by his powerful word."
Remember all the language in
Scripture, when disciples and the people gathered around would inquire,
"how can we know God the father?" Jesus' answer is, if you know me,
then you know the father. For I am in the father and the father is in me. If
you are in me then you will know the father because you are then in direct
contact/relationship with God. Jesus is
not a stepping stone, not a mediator, he is God.
Whereas...
the Gospels present Jesus as God in human flesh, come into the world to
save sinners. In Acts, the message of salvation Christ begins to be
spread throughout the world. The epistles detail the theology of
Christ's work and the personification of Christ in his Body, the Church.
Finally, Revelation presents Christ on the throne, reigning as King of
kings and Lord of lords. In this epistle
- we get a whole lot of theology regarding the work of Christ.
Reconciliation - Theology of Christ's work
·
This next section is Paul
directly uplifting the sufficiency of Christ and the work of Christ. No esoteric
or secret knowledge needs to be discovered to bridge any gaps that exist
between Jesus and God. All that we need in a relationship to God and for
salvation is found in the very person of Jesus Christ. What Christ has done for
us, saves us when we believe in him. He's not an example, he doesn't lead us on
the path to something that does not already exist in him, he is the fullness of
God. To know him is to know God. To trust him is to trust God. He is the first
and the last - our all in all…
19For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him,
20and through him to reconcile
to himself
all things, whether things on earth or
things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.
21Once you were alienated
from God
and were enemies in
your minds because of your evil
behavior.
22But now he has reconciled
you by Christ's physical body
through death to
present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation--
23if you continue in your faith,
established and firm, not moved from
the hope held out in the gospel. This is the gospel that you heard and
that has been
proclaimed to every creature
under heaven, and of which I, Paul, have become a servant.
·
In accounting, reconciliation is the process of
ensuring that two sets of records (usually the balances of two
accounts) are in agreement. Reconciliation is used to
ensure that the money leaving an account matches the actual money spent.
·
In terms of sin - we have a debt. It does not add up... the perfect life we
have been given is not what we can offer God at the end. For the wages of sin is Death - and all fall
short of the Glory of God. It makes us
enemies of God.
·
Who pays that price? We can't!
·
Reconciliation rarely occurs without sacrifice. By giving his one and only Son, God took the initiative
in healing our broken relationship with him. He made the supreme sacrifice for
us that we might be reconciled to him.
Illustration: The “Ragman” (one of Walter Wangerin Jr.’s most beloved
works)
One Friday morning I noticed a young
man, handsome and strong, walking the alleys of our City. He was pulling an old
cart filled with clothes both bright and new, and he was calling in a rich,
baritone voice: “Rags!”
Ah, the air was foul and the
first light filthy to be crossed by such sweet music. “Rags! New rags for old!
I take your tired rags! Rags!”
“Now, this is a wonder,” I
thought to myself, for the man stood six-feet-four, and his arms were like tree
limbs, hard and muscular, and his eyes flashed intelligence. Could he find no
better job than this, to be a ragman in the inner city? I followed him. My
curiosity drove me. And I wasn’t disappointed.
Soon the Ragman saw a woman
sitting on her back porch. She was sobbing into a handkerchief, sighing, and
shedding a thousand tears. Her knees and elbows made a sad X. Her shoulders
shook. Her heart was breaking. The Ragman stopped his cart. Quietly, he walked
to the woman, stepping round tin cans, dead toys, and Pampers. “Give me your
rag,” he said so gently, “and I’ll give you another.” He slipped the
handkerchief from her eyes. She looked up, and he laid across her palm a linen
cloth so clean and new that it shined. She blinked from the gift to the giver.
Then, as he began to pull his
cart again, the Ragman did a strange thing: he put her stained handkerchief to
his own face; and then HE began to weep, to sob as grievously as she had done,
his shoulders shaking. Yet she was left without a tear. “This IS a wonder,” I
breathed to myself, and I followed the sobbing Ragman like a child who cannot
turn away from mystery.
“Rags! Rags! New rags for old!”
In a little while, when the sky
showed gray behind the rooftops and I could see the shredded curtains hanging
out black windows, the Ragman came upon a girl whose head was wrapped in a
bandage, whose eyes were empty. Blood soaked her bandage. A single line of
blood ran down her cheek. Now the tall Ragman looked upon this child with pity,
and he drew a lovely yellow bonnet from his cart. “Give me your rag,” he said,
tracing his own line on her cheek, “and I’ll give you mine.” The child could
only gaze at him while he loosened the bandage, removed it, and tied it to his
own head. The bonnet he set on hers. And I gasped at what I saw: for with the
bandage went the wound! Against his brow it ran a darker, more substantial
blood – his own!
“Rags! Rags! I take old rags!”
cried the sobbing, bleeding, strong, intelligent Ragman. The sun hurt both the
sky, now, and my eyes; the Ragman seemed more and more to hurry.
“Are you going to work?” he asked
a man who leaned against a telephone pole. The man shook his head. The Ragman
pressed him: “Do you have a job?” “Are you crazy?” sneered the other. He pulled
away from the pole, revealing the right sleeve of his jacket, flat, the cuff
stuffed into the pocket. He had no arm. “So,” said the Ragman.
“Give me your jacket, and I’ll
give you mine.” Such quiet authority in his voice! The one-armed man took off
his jacket. So did the Ragman, and I trembled at what I saw: for the Ragman’s
arm stayed in its sleeve, and when the other put it on he had two good arms,
thick as tree limbs; but the Ragman had only one. “Go to work,” he said.
After that he found a drunk,
lying unconscious beneath an army blanket, an old man, hunched, wizened, and
sick. He took that blanket and wrapped it around himself, but for the drunk he
left new clothes. And now I had to run to keep up with the Ragman. Though he
was weeping uncontrollably, and bleeding freely at the forehead, pulling his
cart with one arm, stumbling for drunkenness, falling again and again,
exhausted, old and sick, yet he went with terrible speed. On spider’s legs he
skittered through the alleys of the City, this mile and the next, until he came
to its limits, and then he rushed beyond. I wept to see the change in this man.
I hurt to see his sorrow. And yet I needed to see where he was going in such
haste, perhaps to know what drove him so.
The little old Ragman came to a
landfill. He came to the garbage pits. And then I wanted to help him in what he
did, but I hung back, hiding. He climbed a hill. With tormented labor he
cleared a little space on that hill. Then he sighed. He lay down. He pillowed
his head on a handkerchief and a jacket. He covered his bones with an army
blanket.
And he died. Oh, how I cried to
witness that death! I slumped in a junked car and wailed and mourned as one who
has no hope because I had come to love the Ragman. Every other face had faded
in the wonder of this man, and I cherished him; but he died. I sobbed myself to
sleep. I did not know—how could I know?—that I slept through Friday night and
Saturday and its night, too.
But then, on Sunday morning, I
was wakened by a violence. Light – pure, hard, demanding light – slammed
against my sour face, and I blinked, and I looked, and I saw the last and the
first wonder of all. There was the Ragman, folding the blanket most carefully,
a scar on his forehead, but alive! And, besides that, healthy! There was no
sign of sorrow nor of age, and all the rags that he had gathered shined with
cleanliness.
Then I lowered my head and
trembling for all that I had seen, I myself walked up to the Ragman. I told him
my name with shame, for I was a sorry figure next to him. Then I took off all
my clothes in that place, and I said to him with dear yearning in my voice:
“Dress me.” He dressed me. My God -He put new rags on me, and I am a wonder
beside him. The Ragman, the Ragman, THE CHRIST!
·
Christ taking our infirmities
upon himself...
Conclusion (I may change this up)
·
It seems like for a majority of
us, our relationship with Christ works very similarly to our retirement
program—like some kind of divine Roth IRA or some kind of cosmic 401k (Matt
Chandler). Every month we want to put a little in, hoping we’ve saved up enough
when all is said and done. On the whole, it doesn’t seem there is a passionate
pursuit of, longing for, or submission to Christ as the covering over every
area of our lives. Instead, he becomes our retirement program: something that’s
going to pay dividends when we get closer to death, but not right now. Right
now, what I want to do is put in three percent or five percent a month because
the church is going to match, and then my hope is that when my time comes and
it’s time to retire—when it’s time to die—I’ve got enough that when I stand
before God, I’ve put enough aside to get in.
·
There’s a series of monumental
problems with this. Number one: Christ doesn’t use scales. Your good behavior
are not going to go over there and be weighed out next to your bad. That’s not
what’s going to happen. Who makes you holy and blameless before God? Christ,
the Cross—not monthly installments of church attendance.
·
There are nights I have to get up
and get on my knees and worry and press into the Lord a little bit about the
verses that say, “Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not
prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name
perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away
from me, you evildoers!’” (Matt. 7:22-23) That is a horrifying text of
Scripture. Or how about, “ "Continue to work out your salvation with fear
and trembling” (Phil. 2:12)?
·
There’s this monumental weight to
this thing that seems to escape most of us. There’s this eternal, unbelievable
weight that most of us seem to miss out on. What we end up doing are these good
little church things, and we put that aside and then we have the rest of our
lives. Or we say, “Jesus, you can have Sunday, but I’ve got this. Or you can
get this, and I get this.”
·
We don't make installments. Our lives will always be wanting. Christ has to pay the full price for us...
and does.
·
Who pays that price? We can't!
·
I don’t want to come and say, “Do
better. Amen. You’re dismissed.”
Instead,
we trust in Christ's sufficiency...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.